Several members of the liberal media are furious by the monologue of the “real time” host of Bill Maher recapitulating his dinner with President Donald Trump in the White House.
Maher went viral last Friday in his first show since he and Trump with face to face at a meeting coordinated by his mutual friend Kid Rock.
Maher called Trump “friendly and measured” and suggested that the Oval office man not be the man that the rest of the world sees on television.
“I never felt that I had to walk on egg shells around him,” Maher told his audience. “And honestly, I voted for Clinton and Obama, but I would never feel comfortable talking to them in the way I could talk to Donald Trump. This is how it was put.
While the conservatives celebrated the visit of the White House of Maher, many liberals were bothered by their comments.
“Congratulations, @billmaher. You played for Trump. Easy Mark. He used you as a violin,” the subsistence writer Wajahat Ali reacted in X.
“The VAT does not analyze Maher Prostituting to Trump too much,” wrote former MSNBC presenter Keith Olbermann. “I met Bill since 1978. He was a shameless opportunist without real principles then and remains like this. This is so he can maintain his HBO show.”
The Democratic Strata and Collaborator of Fox News, Leslie Marshall, thought that Maher’s DC visit was purely “selfish”, linking it with the visit of Mar-A-Post-Electoral Lago of the hosts of MSNBC Joe Howki, asking how to ask for asking democracy “to break the bread” with him unless he involves his background.
“When you are overexplained, you are guilty,” Marshall told Fox News Digital. “I guess we will discover in a few months if this was a bad decision for him based on qualifications and subscriptions.”
The Washington Post was quite overwhelming against Maher’s trip to the White House. He publishes a story on Monday entitled “Trump Chamed Bill Maher. Comedian’s fans do not find him fun.”
The report cited Reddit users and comments on social networks criticizing HBO host, many of them promised that they stopped seeing their program, as well as an Oakland lawyer who told The Post that he lacks “empathy” for those affected by trumpeses.
The Washington Post columnist, León Krauze, wrote an article that declares Maher “was interpreted” by Trump, comparing his comments about the president to flatter that others have given Adolf Hitler, Fidel Castro, Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedongs.
“By accepting to meet with Trump, allowing himself to be enchanted in private by a charismatic leader and then share his new soft version of the president, Bill Maher has made Trump head very difficult,” Krauze concluded.
Washington Post’s global security analyst, Josh Rogin, brought his criticism directly to Maher Duration the “real time” panel of discussion, telling the host that he was an “accessory” in the “Trump Trick” of Trump.
MSNBC’s presenter Ayman Mohyeldin accused Maher or did not realize that Trump was “using” and suggested that Maher fed the “normalization of Trumpism” with his visit to the White House.
But not all Liberals see Maher Trump’s dinner as something bad.
“I don’t think there is bad at the meeting,” said Fox News collaborator Richard Fowler, Fox News Digital. “I think that if you stay inside the Washington, DC, Eaway, it is very easy to live within a political silo.”
Fowler said that while the democratic “base” can see something wrong with Trump, they have to face the current reality that “Republicans control all the levers of power” and that they express their conversation that worship in an oval office and summon an officer without success.
“It is a tool in the tool kit of democratic parties,” said Fowler.