Representative James Clyburn, DS.C., described former vice president Kamala Harris, a “great candidate” who was evil for her campaign team, during an interview on Friday.
The Democratic congressman was the response to the CNN presenter, Kate Bolduan, asking about a New York Times report that since the loss of Harris in the 2024 elections, the former vice president has been reflecting on another bidnatorial or.
Clyburn said he was going to advise Harris in his next steps, but praised her as a “tremendous talent” who had his leg for the staff of his campaign duration of the presidential race.
“I will say this. I think she is a tremendous talent. I think she made a great campaign. I think it was evil in that campaign for people who should go to some who saw each other and felt things,” Clyburn.
“I listened to Bill Clinton when they told them they were going to continue. I listened to yours really, when I was surrounding these rural communities, I knew what we needed to do and was not doing it,” he continued.
“She was a great candidate, and I think she will be a great candidate in the future, whatever she decides to run. But I will not give any advice on whether Sheld or should not.”
Harris’s office did not immediately return the request for comments from Fox News Digital.
According to Bombshell’s new book, “Fight: Inside The Wildst Battle for the White House”, by journalists Amie Parnes and Jonathan Allen, Harris “bought exaggeration,” he was going to win the elections.
“She was completely surprised and [Harris’ running mate] Tim Walz was surprised, “Parnes said in the podcast”Someone has to win with Tara Palmeri“Last week.
“They thought they will win. And so, you know, when they return now and say:” Oh, no, we don’t have a chance. “No, that’s not what they were thinking.
Harris campaign employees felt “Gaslit” for leadership about Harris’s possibilities to win after they were told that they looked good “for the candidate before the elections, according to Parnes.
According to the reports, Harris has told his friends after his defeat that he could have won the elections if he had more time and if Biden had postulated for re -election.
“She could have won, she told her friends, if only the elections were later on the calendar, or entered before. In other words, Joe Biden was to blame,” the authors wrote.