Democrats have finally found the leader of their resistance to President Trump.
No, it’s not Sen. Cory Booker and his 25 -hour selfish floor speech.
Nor is Sen. Bernie Sanders or his first-class socialist partner, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
Or any of the mayors and wrong governors that protect migrant criminals from the deserved deportation.
And they are certainly not the idiotic vandals that disfigure teslas with swastika.
Instead, the honor of leading the resistance against the president of the United States goes to Harvard.
Why Harvard?
Because the New York Times, the spokesman and the leader of the radical left, says So.
The gray lady has appointed Harvard for work.
Give it!
In an article that acclaims the rejection of the Ivy League school of any sanction of the White House on the eruptions of anti -Semitism on her campus, Times writer Elisabeth Bumiller is approved approved several people who praise in reality, this is It it it it its its its it is it it it it is it.
His biggest point is clear: this is the war with an administration to the left loves to hate. Give it!
Bumiller and Harvard come to this conclusion just following a tortured path. The investment of the facts is so strange that they end up echoing the claims of slave holes of the precil war on the rights of the states.
In this case, Harvard and its defenders act as if the manifestations of the Anti -Semitic campus were a civil right for school instead of a violation of the civil rights of Jewish students!
And, unlike Columbia, who had the good sense of accepting federal demands, Harvard is ready to fight.
In his letter that rejected the intervention, Harvard’s lawyers say “will not deliver their independence or resignation are constitutional rights.”
As others have pointed out, what would we call this general defense if the students who had damaged the legs were black or Jews?
By refusing only to negotiate, the best and most brilliant calls have opened to massive financial sanctions.
The setback began immediately, with the White House announcing that it has frozen $ 2.2 billion in subsidies of several years and canceled a $ 60 million contract.
The president also raised the possibility of ending Harvard’s fiscal sex.
In general, it is said that Harvard obtains around $ 9 billion a year from Washington, with the fixed mass that goes to affiliated hospitals and medical centers.
Even allowing school provision of approximately $ 52 billion, its decision to put at risk discretionary federal money or anti -Semitic protests seems especially dumb.
Too much for the best and brilliant test.
A call to arms
Bumiller’s article, like everything else at the time when it is Trump, is the call of an activist to weapons.
Among the Harvard defenders who quotes is Michael S. Roth, president of the Wesleyan University, whom Bumiller calls “a rare White House critic among university administrators,” which is absurdly since they are a ten cent.
She is delighted that he welcomed Harvard’s decision to fight and so special in her line that “it’s like a thug stops dry.”
Look what she did there: Trump is a thug and he is stopped!
He also quotes J. Michael Luttig, who says: “This is a transcendental and transcendental meaning”, as if a moment were not enough.
She calls Lutty a prominent judge of the Federal Court of Appeals “revered by many conservatives”, while ignoring the fact that he is a well -known Enemy of Trump.
Apparently, he could not find a university leader or judge that he thinks that the president is doing the right thing.
Bumiller also reads minds, when she states that “the fight with Harvard … is one that President Trump and Stephen Miller, a powerful White House assistant, because having.”
She does not cite a source of how she knows it, but does not need sources. Look, the writers of all time can read Trump’s mind and divine their motive, which is always malevolent.
Even so, Bumiller is doing something when he makes this observation: “A high profile battle in the House of Representatives would give the White House a platform to argue continuous that the left has become synonymous with anti -Semitism, elitism and suppression of freedom of expression.”
‘We like it, so do it’
She is right, although with an error: a court with Harvard is not necessary to prove that.
There are doubts that the left is a source or “anti -semitism, elitism and suppression of freedom of expression.”
It is also a source or anti -Americanism.
Harvard is just one of the many examples. Columbia, Penn, Yale, Cornell, Brown, Cal Berkeley, Michigan and dozens of other schools are guilty of the same transgressions.
In more general terms, the entire process of Democrats that form a resistance is a special stranger now.
Trump and the Republicans obtained radical victories in the elections where they explained what they intended to do.
Being so specific about so many things, Mareans winning voters gave them a mandate: we like it, so do it.
Now that the victors are doing it, the indignation to the left is erupting, if the president is an intruder surprises of a nation of victims.
Nonsense. In fact, it is just another bit or erroneous information to represent Trump’s movements as coming out of nowhere.
The fact that the times and other leftist media do not like it does not like it does not make their actions illegitimate.
The biggest problem for the resistant is that they do not have their own coherent agenda, and they are not very followers. Trump’s rapid success by sealing the border after Joe Biden left him open for four years cemented his action reputation and fulfilled his word.
Similarly, the decision of the media and some Democrats of being ballistic about radical foreigners that are aligned with terrorist groups that have their green letters and revoked visas is another political loser.
Allowing men in female sports is also tremendously unpopular, but Democrats are also going down with that ship.
Inaction and silence
In that sense, Harvard’s case is instructive. Biden Democrats and Congress said little and did nothing like shameful episodes or anti -Semitism that started many campuses.
His inaction and silence were especially scandalous given the horror of October 7, 2023, when Hamas invaded Israel and killed 1,250 people, including more Jews than in any day from the Holocaust.
Most of the dead were civilians, like most of the 250 hostage tasks that date back to Gaza’s roles. Incredible, 556 days later, 59 are still arrested, with only 24 thoughts to be alive.
The defenders of this cult of death embarrassed Harvard and other universities with their protests, asking for the elimination of Israel and harassing Jewish students. For Harvard to say that the government has no right to penalize it, aggravates injustice.
There is, or of course, an easy solution. Harvard can reject all federal funds, such as some schools, including Hillsdale College, they do and free itelf of Washington.
All you can’t do is have it both ways. If federal money is needed, you have to play with federal rules.
Compensation is so simple that Harvard should be able to understand it.