After 12 days, Israel and Iran agreed to stop the fire in their war, one that was effective and very publicly imposed on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by the president of the United States, Donald Trump, this morning. Arriving only three days after the United States bombarded three Iranian nuclear facilities and one day after Iran responded with a telegravated attack on an American military base in Qatar, the high fire limits what it has of the events of the region of the region of the equivalence of events of events.
The risk of climbing, particularly between the United States and Iran, now seems to have been declared. But the nature of the conflict, the way in which it is over and the wild card represented by the ad hoc and erratic approach of Trump for crisis management makes any attempt to evaluate its result is vulnerable to being surpassed by the events.
That said, as it was clear that the United States and Iran had chosen what was equivalent to a choreographed disaster to their conflict, there was a visible division in the initial comment between security analysts in one hand, and policies and aquatic policies in the Ethear Israel analysis had achieved. The various arguments they pose point to the cost-benefit analysis still uncertain that will determine the long-term results of the conflict.
]